Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AMD Resources Limited v AU Gold Pty Ltd, in the matter of AMD Resources Limited [2022] FCA 1212 File number: VID 566 of 2022
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 12 October 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – where applicant seeks orders for substituted service and costs – order for substituted service made
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 10.24
Cases cited: British American Tobacco Australasia Limited v Taleb (No 1) [2012] FCA 1065 Foxe v Brown (1984) 58 ALR 542; [1984] HCA 69 Ross v Cotter [2015] FCA 310 Statewide Secured Investments Pty Ltd v Tarrant [2011] FCA 1067
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 12 October 2022
Counsel for the applicant: Ms Harris
Solicitor for the applicant: Carbone Lawyers
Counsel for the first to fourth respondents: The first to fourth respondents did not appear
Solicitor for the first to fourth respondents: The first to fourth respondents did not appear
ORDERS VID 566 of 2022 IN THE MATTER OF AMD RESOURCES LIMITED (A.C.N. 602 696 873) BETWEEN: AMD RESOURCES LIMITED (A.C.N. 602 696 873) Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate