Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Credit Suisse AG v Gu [2022] FCA 1220 File number: NSD 211 of 2022
Judgment of: CHEESEMAN J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where referee appointed pursuant to s 54A(1) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to prepare a report on applications for security for costs – where no party moves the Court to reject the referee's report – whether the report should be adopted, varied or rejected – Held: referee's report adopted in the whole.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 54A(1), 54A(3), 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 19.01, 28.67
Cases cited: Buckley v Bennell Design & Constructions Pty Ltd (1974) 1 ACLR 301 Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades [2016] FCAFC 170; 344 ALR 558 Mecrus Pty Ltd v Industrial Energy Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 103 Nine Films and Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Ltd [2005] FCA 735; 146 FCR 144 Pegasus Gold Inc v Bateman Project Engineering Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1734 Quach v MLC Limited [2022] FCA 586 Winnote Pty Ltd (in liq) v Page [2005] NSWCA 362; 64 NSWLR 244
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate