Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited [2022] FCA 1246 File number(s): VID 794 of 2016
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 19 October 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – lump-sum costs procedure – whether the second respondent ought to provide the applicant with source material verifying the costs and disbursements claimed – where the source material is sought to verify the apportionment of costs between two related proceedings.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N
Cases cited: Bayley & Associates Pty Ltd v DBR Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 346 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 146 Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited (No 3)[2020] FCA 1379 Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited [2019] FCA 1662; 375 ALR 251
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade marks
Number of paragraphs: 26
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submission/s: 3 March 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Sykes
Solicitor for the Applicant: Actuate IP
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Ms M J Evetts
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
ORDERS VID 794 of 2016
BETWEEN: PINNACLE RUNWAY PTY LTD Applicant
AND: TRIANGL LIMITED First Respondent
TRIANGL GROUP LIMITED Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate