Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogawa v President, Australian Human Rights Commission (No 3) [2022] FCA 1260 File number: VID 792 of 2020
Judgment of: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interim suppression order – application refused
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AF
Cases cited: Ogawa (formerly Ms PD) v President of the Australian Human Rights Commission (Pseudonym) [2022] FCAFC 160
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 18
Date of hearing: 21 October 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant was self-represented
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Mr E Eteuati of Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS VID 792 of 2020
BETWEEN: MEGUMI OGAWA First Applicant AND: PRESIDENT OF THE AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION First Respondent
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Second Respondent
order made by: MORTIMER J DATE OF ORDER: 21 October 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an interim suppression order contained in the interlocutory application dated 26 September 2022 is refused. 2. No order as to costs. THE COURT DIRECTS THAT: 3. The hearing of the interlocutory application for suppression orders in VID792/2020 be allocated to a Judge for determination as soon as reasonably practicable. 4. A copy of the transcript of the hearing on 21 October 2022 be provided to the applicant and the second respondent, on the basis that it is in the interests of justice for this to occur, and on the basis that the applicant is self-represented. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate