Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Mbuzi v Hird [2022] FCA 1285 Appeal from: Mbuzi v Hird [2022] FedCFamC2G 38
File number: QUD 59 of 2022
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 31 October 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appeal from decision of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to dismiss application for review of Registrar's decision – where Registrar refused to accept an originating application for filing on the basis that it constituted an abuse of process – whether primary judge failed to provide adequate reasons – whether primary judge erred in failing to consider submissions – where error did not give rise to any substantial miscarriage of justice – where originating application was an abuse of process – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 16(1) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 138A, Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law ss 2, 18, 20, 21, 22 Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 10(2) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth) ss 131, 134, 217(1), 256 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) rr 1.06, 1.31, 1.32, 2.06, 21.01 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 19(1), 28(1)(f), 32(1), 59(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.26 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B State Penalties Enforcement Act 1999 (Qld) ss 7, 8, 9, 33, 34, 35, 102(1), 103(1)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 204 CLR 559 Bride v Shire of Katanning [2016] FCA 65 Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1987) 18 FCR 212 Charisteas v Charisteas [2021] HCA 29; (2021) 393 ALR 389 Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design and Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577 Conway v The Queen (2002) 209 CLR 203 Dennis v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2019) 272 FCR 343 DL v The Queen (2018) 266 CLR 1 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 197 ALR 389 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Felton v Mulligan (1971) 124 CLR 367 Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 Fletcher v Nextra Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 229 FCR 153 Gambaro v Mobycom Mobile Pty Ltd (2019) 271 FCR 530 Goodwin v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWCA 239 Jess v Cooloola Milk Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 75 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 Johnson v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 11 FCR 351 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Jorgensen v Fair Work Ombudsman (2019) 271 FCR 461 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 Markit Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [2007] 1 Qd R 253 Mbuzi v Hird [2022] FedCFamC2G 38 Miller v Haweis (1907) 5 CLR 89 Murphy v Victoria (2014) 45 VR 119 Nyoni v Shire of Kellerberrin (No 6) [2015] FCA 1294 Public Service Board (NSW) v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 Qantas Airways Ltd v Lustig (2015) 228 FCR 148 R v T, WA (2014) 118 SASR 382 RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620 Ultimate Vision Inventions Pty Ltd v Innovation and Science Australia [2022] FCA 606; (2022) 176 ALD 1 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Westpac Banking Corp v Paterson (1999) 95 FCR 59; (1999) 167 ALR 377 Windoval Pty Ltd v Donnelly (2014) 226 FCR 89 Winn v Boss Lawyers Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 156
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate