Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Lee [2022] FCA 1307 File number: NSD 697 of 2021
Judgment of: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 3 November 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application by the respondents for suppression and related orders under s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia 1976 (Cth) in relation to the entire court file – where a request for non-party access was made by a journalist under r 2.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in relation to affidavits relied upon to obtain freezing orders – where request is opposed by the respondents – whether a suppression order is necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – whether potential damage to reputation and thereby commercial interests is sufficient to justify a suppression order – whether the approval of the non-party access request is inconsistent with the confidentiality regime of the Tax Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – Held: interlocutory application dismissed and access request granted
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt VAA, Div 2; ss 17, 37AE, 37AF, 37AF(1), 37AG(1), 37AG(1)(a), 37AG(1)(b), 37AG(1)(c), 37AG(1)(d), 50. Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 960-100 International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Sch 1, Ch 5, Pt 5-1, Div 355, Subdiv 355-A, 355-B, 355-C, 355-D; ss 3AA(2), 14ZZE, 355-1, 355-10, 355-20, 355-15(c), 355-15(c)(ii), 355-50(1), 355-150, 355-155, 355-155(b), 355-160, 355-165, 355-170 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.32, 2.32(2), 2.32(3), 2.32(3)(a), 2.32(3)(b), 2.32(4) Explanatory Memorandum, Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate