Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DCL22 v Sage [2022] FCA 1310 File number: VID 530 of 2022
Judgment of: ABRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 10 October 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 3 November 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – public interest immunity – where documents produced pursuant to notice to produce are redacted – where documents include written reasons for the issue of a summons under s 28(1) of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – where applicant challenges the validity of the Summons – whether redacted passages are covered by public interest immunity – claim established
Legislation: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 7, 7A, 7C, 20-22, 24A, 28, 29A and 30 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 130 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B
Cases cited: Alfred Crompton Amusement Machines Ltd v Customs and Excise Commissioners (No. 2) [1974] AC 405 Alister v The Queen [1984] HCA 85; (1984) 154 CLR 404 Assistant Commissioner Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 7; (2013) 252 CLR 38 Attorney-General (NSW) v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 Barnes v Boulton [2004] FCA 1219; (2004) 139 FCR 356 Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1991) 52 A Crim R 423 Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (1991) 31 FCR 523 Burmah Oil Co. Ltd. v Governor and Company of the Bank of England and Another [1980] AC 1090 Cain v Glass (No 2) (1985) 3 NSWLR 230 Church of Scientology Inc v Woodward [1982] HCA 78; (1982) 154 CLR 25 Commonwealth v Northern Land Council [1993] HCA 24; (1993) 176 CLR 604 Commonwealth v Northern Land Council (1991) 30 FCR 1 Conway v Rimmer [1968] AC 910 D v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children [1978] AC 171 DBCT Management Pty Ltd v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd and Geosea Australia Pty Ltd Joint Venture [2021] FCA 512 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith (1996) 86 A Crim R 308 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 67; (1999) 201 CLR 49 Gypsy Jokers Motorcycle Club Inc v Commissioner of Police [2008] HCA 4; (2008) 234 CLR 532 Harper v Costigan (1983) 72 FLR 140 HT v The Queen [2019] HCA 40; (2019) 278 A Crim R 133 Marinovich v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor (1987) 14 ALD 315 National Crime Authority v Gould (1989) 23 FCR 191 National Companies and Securities Commission v News Corporation Ltd [1984] HCA 29; (1984) 156 CLR 296 Polley v Johnson; Gillard v Johnson; Ward v Higgs [2013] NSWSC 543 R v Baladjam & Ors (No 29) [2008] NSWSC 1452 R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 596; (2006)199 FLR 270 Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 14) [2021] FCA 552 Rogers v Home Department State Secretary; Gaming Board for Great Britain v Rogers [1973] AC 388 Sankey v Whitlam [1978] HCA 43; (1978) 142 CLR 1 SDCV v Director-General of Security [2022] HCA 32 The Australian Statistician v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2008] WASCA 34; (2008) 36 WAR 83 Young v Quin (1985) 4 FCR 483 ZX v Commonwealth [2016] FCA 1013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate