Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Higgins v JSS Logistics Pty Ltd (in liq) [2022] FCA 1320 File number: WAD 265 of 2021
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2022
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - application for approval of provisional liquidators' remuneration - procedural requirements satisfied - remuneration sought reasonable - amount of remuneration approved
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 472, 473, Schedule 2 (Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations)) ss 60-10, 60-12, 60-16 Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) r 9.3
Cases cited: Conlan v Adams [2008] WASCA 61 Hundy (liquidator), re Renewable Energy Traders Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 1795 Morgan, re Brighton Hall Securities Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 2029 Re Barokes Pty Ltd (in liq) [2020] VSC 555 Re Sakr Nominees Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 668 Re Sirrah Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1636 Sanderson as liquidator of Sakr Nominees Pty Ltd (in liq) v Sakr [2017] NSWCA 38; (2017) 93 NSWLR 459 Venetian Nominees Pty Ltd v Conlan (1998) 20 WAR 96
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 28
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Solicitor for the Interested Party: Trinix Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate