Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Beijing Hua Xin Liu He Investment (Australia) Pty Ltd v Lu (No 4) [2022] FCA 1322 File number: WAD 563 of 2016
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2022
Catchwords: COSTS - second application for summary judgment - parties seek competing costs orders - whether costs should be paid forthwith - whether costs should be paid on lump sum basis - whether costs should be paid on indemnity basis
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Cases cited: Beijing Hua Xin Liu He Investment (Australia) Pty Ltd v Lu [2017] FCA 319 Beijing Hua Xin Liu He Investment (Australia) Pty Ltd v Lu [2017] FCAFC 186 Beijing Hua Xin Liu He Investment (Australia) Pty Ltd v Lu (No 3) [2022] FCA 108 Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Costs Forthwith) [2019] FCA 1065 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Lu v Beijing Hua Xin Liu He Investment (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 654 Watson v Kriticos (Costs of Summary Judgment Application) [2021] FCA 917 Young v Wyllie (No 2) [2010] FCA 616
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 37
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate