Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Obel v Central Desert Regional Council [2022] FCA 1355 File number: NTD 1 of 2022
Judgment of: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 24 October 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 11 November 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether respondent's defence contains sufficient admissions to warrant summary judgment for the applicant in respect of some or all of his claims – whether the applicant should be granted judgment by virtue of defaults alleged against the respondent – whether there should be an order for the trial of separate issues
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 31A, 37M, 37P Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.61, 4.03, 5.02, 5.22, 5.23, 7.23, 11.06, 16.32, 26.01
Cases cited: CPJ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 258 FCR 495 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Hillier v Martin (No 8) [2021] FCA 1272; 155 ACSR 395 Mulvaney (liquidator), in the matter of Skymax Group Pty Ltd (in liq) v Wen [2021] FCA 1644 NWWJ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 176 Prodata Solutions Pty Ltd v South Australian Fire and Emergency Services Commission (No 3) [2020] FCA 1210 Spencer v The Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118
Division: Fair Work Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate