Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Four Air Leitchville Pty Ltd v Hurlad Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1372 File number: VID 120 of 2020
Judgment of: LEE J
Date of judgment: 10 November 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 24 November 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for further security for costs – where costs incurred exceed those anticipated when security ordered by consent – whether conduct of the third and fourth respondents tends against the exercise of discretion to award further security – "broad brush" assessment – orders for security for costs made
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 s 18 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt VB
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Number of paragraphs: 14
Date of hearing: 10 November 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Shirrefs
Solicitor for the Applicant: Maitland Lawyers
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Mr J Waters
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Frenkel Partners as town agents for PS Law
Counsel for the Third and Fourth Respondents: Mr C G Juebner SC
Solicitor for the Third and Fourth Respondents: SBA Law
ORDERS VID 120 of 2020
BETWEEN: FOUR AIR LEITCHVILLE PTY LTD (ACN 006 929 219) Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate