Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogawa v President of the Australian Human Rights Commission [2022] FCA 1396 Appeal from: Ogawa v President, Australia Human Rights Commission (No 3) [2022] FCA 1260
File number: QUD 383 of 2022
Judgment of: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 24 November 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from an order dismissing an application for an interim suppression order pursuant to s 37AI of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether the decision to be appealed is attended with sufficient doubt to warrant its reconsideration on appeal – whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AF, 37AG(1), 37AI
Cases cited: Bellamy's Australia Limited v Basil [2019] FCAFC 147; (2019) 372 ALR 638 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Ogawa (formerly Ms PD) v President of the Australia Human Rights Commission (Leave to Appeal) [2022] FCAFC 161 Ogawa (formerly Ms PD) v President of the Australia Human Rights Commission (Pseudonym) [2022] FCAFC 160 Registered Clubs Association of New South Wales v Stolz (No 4) [2022] FCA 994
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 50
Date of hearing: 14 November 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate