Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nafady v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1434 File number: QUD 149 of 2022
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 30 November 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a personal decision by Minister not to revoke visa cancellation decision made under s 501(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – relationship between reasonable suspicion in s 501(3)(c) and reasonable satisfaction in s 501C(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where applicant initially convicted of sexual offences against five women – where convictions subsequently quashed and retrial returned not guilty verdicts – where Minister undertakes own review of sentencing remarks and reasons for judgment on appeal and subsequent retrial – where Minister not able to rule out the possibility that the applicant had committed serious sexual offences in the past – where Minister finds that there is a risk that applicant will engage in serious sexual offending in the future – where Minister's decision does not expose basis upon which the Minister formed a reasonable satisfaction that the applicant did not pass the character test – application granted
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 33 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 116, 501, 501A, 501C, 501CA
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353 Boughey v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 10 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Cadbury UK Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks [2008] FCA 1126 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Coker v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 929 De Silva v The Queen (2019) 268 CLR 57 EVX20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1079 Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld) (2004) 223 CLR 575 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 263 CLR 1 Hussien v Chong Fook Kam [1970] AC 942 HZCP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 273 FCR 121 MBJY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1161 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa (2021) 270 CLR 430 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Sabharwal [2018] FCAFC 160 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 44 FLR 41 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v Viane (2021) 96 ALJR 13 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SGLB (2004) 207 ALR 12 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 96 ALJR 737 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs (2022) 96 ALJR 497 Sullivan v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2014) 226 FCR 555 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 243 FCR 220 Yasmin v Attorney-General (Cth) (2015) 236 FCR 169
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate