Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Bradshaw v BSA Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 1440 File numbers: VID 488 of 2020
Judgment of: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 30 November 2022
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – application for approval of settlement of representative proceeding – s 33V of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – principles relevant to settlement approval – whether proposed settlement fair and reasonable – whether common fund order should be made and in what terms – relevant principles – whether certain deductions from settlement sums should be allowed – whether sum proposed as funder's commission is appropriate – consideration as to the appropriate rate of commission in a proceeding instituted in the "no-costs" jurisdiction of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – whether costs incurred by a funder for adverse costs insurance should be allowed – whether pre-retainer legal costs should be allowed in full – whether deduction sought for legal costs including uplift appropriate – whether non-publication orders should be made – settlement approved on basis that the distribution of the settlement sum proposed be adjusted to reflect a reduction of the funder's commission, the disallowance of adverse costs insurance and the disallowance in part of pre-retainer legal costs.
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (Vic)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate