Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Tucker v State of Victoria [2022] FCA 1449 File number: VID 658 of 2022
Judgment of: ANDERSON J
Date of judgment: 1 December 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 2 December 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal interlocutory orders – where the applicant has no right to appeal pursuant to s 24(1AA) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – application refused
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Bright v Femcare Ltd (2002) 195 ALR 574; [2002] FCA 243 Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 3) [2022] FCA 1280 House v King (1936) 55 CLR 449 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513 Oswal v Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd (Recs and Mgrs Appt) (2011) 85 ACSR 531 Revill v John Holland Group Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 558 Singh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 956 SZMTM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 181 Tran v Singh [2019] FCA 70
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 30
Date of hearing: 1 December 2022
Counsel for the applicant: The applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate