Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McLeod v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1479 File number: VID 299 of 2022
Judgment of: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 9 December 2022
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where Minister served a notice of intention to consider cancellation of a visa under s 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where the notice attached material said to suggest that the visa holder did not pass the character test by virtue of s 501(6)(b), namely that the Minister reasonably suspects that the person had been or was a member of a group or organisation and that the group or organisation had been or was involved in criminal conduct – where the visa holder commenced the present proceeding seeking relief before any decision had been made to cancel his visa – where the applicant contended that on the material set out in and attached to the notice it was not open to the Minister to form a reasonable suspicion of the matters in s 501(6)(b) – where the applicant sought declaratory relief – whether, as a matter of discretion, the Court should decline to grant declaratory relief
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 501, 501D
Cases cited: ARG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 250 FCR 109 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 252 FCR 352 DAO16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 258 FCR 175 FUD18 v Minister for Home Affairs (2021) 285 FCR 505 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makasa (2021) 270 CLR 430 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Roach v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 750 Taulahi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 246 FCR 146
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate