Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Amory v RMS Engineering & Construction Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1505 File number: QUD 30 of 2021
Judgment of: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 16 December 2022
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – Application for approval of settlement – applicable principles – whether proposed settlement is fair and reasonable in the interests of the group members – settlement approved
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 45, 50, 323, 343(1), 536(3), 550, 557A(2) and 570 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33V Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Fisher (trustee for the Tramik Super Fund Trust) v Vocus Group Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 579 Newstart 123 Pty Ltd v Billabong International Ltd [2016] FCA 1194; (2016) 343 ALR 662 Williams v FAI Home Security Pty Ltd (No 4) [2000] FCA 1925; (2000) 180 ALR 459
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 32
Date of interlocutory hearing: 10 November 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Black
Solicitor for the Applicant: Queensland Workplace & Workplace Injury Law
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr B McMillan and Mr A Schriiffer
Solicitor for the Respondents: Connolly Suthers Lawyers
ORDERS QUD 30 of 2021
BETWEEN: KERRY AMORY Applicant
AND: RMS ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD ACN 128 352 250 First Respondent
RICHARD MCDONALD Second Respondent
HELEN HOBBS (and another named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate