Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Panagiotidis v IProsper Financial Planning Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1508 File numbers: VID 249 of 2022 VID 250 of 2022
Judgment of: RAPER J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2022
Catchwords: COURTS – practice and procedure – whether an order by a judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to transfer civil proceedings to the Federal Court of Australia should be confirmed pursuant to s 32AD of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – transfer not confirmed
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Pt 3–1, ss 44, 45, 323(1), 323(3), 340, 345, 357, 535(1) and 535(2), 550, 557, 557B, 570 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth) ss 153, 153(1), 153(3), 154 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 32AC, 32AC(6), 32AD, 32AD(1) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) 8.02, 8.02(4), 8.02(4)(e) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 27.12(3)
Cases cited: KDSP v Secretary of the Department of Home Affairs [2022] FCA 1406 Van den Berg v Monash Health [2022] FCA 796
Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 36
Date of last submission: 9 December 2022
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicants: Ms L Marrone
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate