Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogawa v Australian Information Commissioner [2022] FCA 1514 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal and stay: Ogawa v Australian Information Commissioner [2022] FCA 1374
File number: QUD 426 of 2022
Judgment of: FEUTRILL J
Date of judgment: 8 December 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 14 December 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – application for stay of primary judge's orders pending appeal – assessment of prospects of obtaining leave to appeal –whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory – whether any prejudice would flow from refusal of a stay – application dismissed.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 29
Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Dubow v Fitness First (Australia) Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 660 Ogawa v Australian Information Commissioner [2022] FCA 1374
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 15
Date of hearing: 8 December 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T Boys
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Holding Redlich
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Ms B Griffin
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS QUD 426 of 2022
BETWEEN: DR MEGUMI OGAWA Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate