Federal Court of Australia
thE Federal Court of Australia
Dahdah v Platinum Distributors Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2022] FCA 1553 File number: NSD 61 of 2019
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2022
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs pursuant to s 570 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – where applicant found to have given untruthful evidence at trial – whether proceedings instituted without reasonable cause – relationship between s 570(2) and s 43(1)(b) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – costs awarded pursuant to s 570 Fair Work Act
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 570 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(1)(b)
Cases cited: Augusta Ventures Ltd v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 194 Australian Workers Union v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCAFC 23; 232 FCR 428 Celand v Skycity Adelaide Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 222; 256 FCR 306 Commonwealth of Australia v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2003] FCAFC 115; 129 FCR 271 Dahdah v Platinum Distributors Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 416 Kanan v Australian Postal and Telecommunications Union [1992] FCA 539; 43 IR 257 Ryan v Primesafe [2015] FCA 8; 323 ALR 107 Saxena v PPF Asset Management Ltd [2011] FCA 395 Trustee for The MTGI Trust v Johnston (No 2) [2016] FCAFC 190
Division: Fair Work Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate