Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fulton v Chief of the Defence Force [2022] FCA 1582 File number(s): QUD 21 of 2021
Judgment of: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2022
Catchwords: DEFENCE AND WAR – application for review of decision by delegate of Chief of the Defence Force –termination of service with Defence Force pursuant to reg 24(1)(c), Defence Regulation 2016 – whether termination decision vitiated by breach of procedural fairness because applicant given insufficient time to respond to termination notice – where failure to take into account applicant's service, personal performance reports, and mental health alleged to constitute failure to have regard to relevant considerations – whether error in taking into account applicant's traffic offence despite no conviction being recorded – whether delegate impermissibly limited the material to which he was obliged to consider – where no breach of procedural fairness or other error of law established – application dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 16 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 85ZL, 85ZM, 85ZV, 85ZW, 85ZZH Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) s 153 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N Crimes Regulations 2019 (Cth) reg 21, Sch 2 Defence Regulation 2016 (Cth) regs 6, 24, 28, 30 Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) s 12
Cases cited: Allesch v Maunz [2000] HCA 40; (2000) 203 CLR 172 Aon Risk Services Australia Pty Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Chief of Defence Force v Gaynor [2017] FCAFC 41; (2017) 246 FCR 298 Coutts v Close, Assistant Commissioner of Australian Federal Police [2014] FCA 19 Gaynor v Chief of the Defence Force (No 3) [2015] FCA 1370; (2015) 237 FCR 188 Graham v Deputy Chief of Air Force [2004] FCA 1377 Hartwig v Hack [2007] FCA 1039 Luck v Chief Executive Officer of Centrelink [2015] FCAFC 75 Martincevic v Commonwealth [2007] FCAFC 164; (2007) 164 FCR 45 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; (2009) 111 ALD 15 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20; (1995) 183 CLR 273 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh [2004] FCAFC 256; (2004) 139 FCR 505 Ozepulse Pty Ltd v Minister for Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry [2007] FCA 1601; (2007) 163 FCR 562 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 96 ALJR 497 Plaintiff M61/2010 v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 41; (2010) 243 CLR 319 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6; (2003) 214 CLR 1 Shand v Chief of Army [1998] FCA 265 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CLR 152 Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 452; [1995] FCA 987
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate