Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Dunstan v Orr [2022] FCA 1589 File number(s): ACD 45 of 2022
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 16 September 2022
Date of publication of reasons: 23 December 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application seeking leave to appeal from decision of primary judge not to recuse himself from the proceedings on the grounds of actual and apprehended bias – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.11(2)(f)
Cases cited: Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; 33 FCR 397 Dunstan v Orr [2008] FCA 31; 217 FCR 559 Dunstan v Orr [2022] FCA 1006 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited [2013] FCAFC 150 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; 205 CLR 507 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 81 FCR 71
Division: General Division
Registry: Australian Capital Territory
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 26
Date of last submissions: 13 September 2022
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant was self-represented
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate