Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ogawa v Australian Information Commissioner (No 2) [2022] FCA 1610 File number: QUD 387 of 2021
Judgment of: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 19 December 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary dismissal application – respondent submissions not response to dismissal application – no cause of action for determination – proceeding dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 12
Date of hearing: 19 December 2022
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Holding Redlich
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS QUD 387 of 2021
BETWEEN: MEGUMI OGAWA Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIAN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER First Respondent
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS Second Respondent
order made by: LOGAN J DATE OF ORDER: 19 DECEMBER 2022
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's outline of submissions be placed on the Court file. 2. The proceedings be dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the costs of and incidental to the proceedings, including the applications for dismissal, and subject to any costs orders already made, to be fixed by a registrar in a lump-sum if not agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate