Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Ferdinands v Allaway, National Duty Registrar (No 2) [2023] FCA 12 File number(s): SAD 117 of 2022
Judgment of: O'SULLIVAN J
Date of judgment: 20 January 2023
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of Registrar's decision to refuse to accept documents for filing pursuant to r 2.26 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether the applicant has standing to seek a review of the decision pursuant to s 11(1) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) – where the application for judicial review does not identify the grounds in s 5(1) of the ADJR Act – where a Registrar's decision is of an administrative character – where the documents were refused on the basis they are an abuse of the process of the Court, frivolous and vexatious – where the Registrar did not make substantive judgment about the underlying merit of the claims when refusing to accept the documents – application for judicial review dismissed
Legislation: 1 The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Cth), ss 51(xxv), 109 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 5(1), 11(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37AM Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 2.26, 31.01(1)
Cases cited: Ferdinands v Registrar Cridland [2022] FCAFC 80 Ferdinands v Registrar Cridland [2021] FCA 592 Ferdinands v Registrar Stone [2022] FCA 589 Nyoni v Murphy [2018] FCAFC 75; (2018) 261 FCR 164
Division: General Division
Registry: South Australia
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate