Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Pan v Hampton Accelerate Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 46 File number(s): QUD 118 of 2022
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 2 February 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application – application for non-standard discovery – rules 20.13, 20.15 and 20.17 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – principles referrable to an order for discovery – whether applicant has established the onus of satisfying the court that the documents sought are necessary – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd v Quasar Resources Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 1044 Rivas v The Republic of Chile [2020] FCA 737
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 24
Date of hearing: 1 February 2023
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr O Cook
Solicitor for the Applicant: Auslaw Partners
Counsel for the First, Second and Fourth Respondents: Ms F Lubett
Solicitor for the First, Second and Fourth Respondents: Bridges Lawyers
ORDERS QUD 118 of 2022
BETWEEN: MINER PAN Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate