Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
PlayUp Limited v Mintas (No 2) [2023] FCA 52 File number: NSD 1247 of 2021
Judgment of: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 3 February 2023
Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs – whether the defendant's rejection of an offer was unreasonable – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 39.05(c), 40.02, 40.13
Cases cited: Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Ltd v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 318 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International B.V. (No 5) [2018] FCA 19 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd [1988] FCA 364; 81 ALR 397 LFDB v Ms S M (No 2) [2018] FCA 2062 Luo v Zhai (No 6) [2016] FCA 805 Mahony v El Bayeh (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 325 Quach v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 311
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 50
Date of last submissions 16 November 2022 (Plaintiff) 30 November 2022 (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate