Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd (No 13) [2023] FCA 84 File number(s): VID 180 of 2018 VID 182 of 2018
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 14 February 2023
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – application for approval of settlement by Court pursuant to s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether proposed distribution scheme fair and reasonable as between group members – whether legal costs incurred in the proceedings fair and reasonable – whether legal costs proportionate – whether cost reports prepared by court appointed referee should be adopted – whether adequate disclosure and monitoring of legal costs – whether any deferred fee arrangements in place between applicants' solicitors and litigation funder – whether funding commission fair and reasonable – whether Federal Court of Australia has the power to make a common fund order pursuant to s 33V(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) or in its equitable jurisdiction under s 5(2) – held: Federal Court of Australia has no power to make a common fund order – Cantor v Audi Australia Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] FCA 637 applied – whether, if the court did have such power, a common fund order should be made in any event – whether a fund equalisation order should be made and if so in what amount – whether terms of funding agreements proved – submissions filed by applicants after the hearing had concluded going beyond terms of leave granted – submissions thus ignored – whether applicants' granted leave to re-open their case to adduce further evidence – whether on the application of the applicants litigation funder entitled to a "gross-up" of its funding commission, including in circumstances where funder did not seek it – orders made amending settlement scheme to permit administrator temporarily to transfer part or all of settlement sum from a "settlement distribution account" to other bank accounts for the purpose of accruing higher rates of interest – power of court to make such orders considered – further hearing of proceedings adjourned to a date to be fixed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate