Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SPFH v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 97 File number(s): VID 273 of 2021
Judgment of: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to affirm a decision to not revoke the cancellation of the applicant's visa pursuant to s 501CA(4) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal failed to give proper consideration to the risk that the applicant faced indefinite detention if the visa cancellation decision was not revoked – whether in concluding that the applicant did not face a risk of indefinite detention the Tribunal's reasons are illogical or irrational – application allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 4, 189, 195A, 196, 197AC, 197AE, 197C, 198, 499, 501, 501BA, 501CA
Cases cited: AJL20 v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] FCA 1305 Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109 Ali v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 650 AQM18 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAF 27; 268 FCR 424 ASP15 v Commonwealth of Australia [2016] FCAFC 145; 248 FCR 372 AZAFQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 105; 243 FCR 451 BAL19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 2189; 168 ALD 276 BDQ19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1630 BFMV v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 573 BFMV v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 199 HL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 94; 277 FCR 420 Commonwealth of Australia v AJL20 [2021] HCA 21; 273 CLR 43 DLJ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 236 DOB18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1523 DQM18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 110; 278 FCR 334 DYY18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1901 FBW18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1878 FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185; (2019) 374 ALR 601 Greene v Assistant Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 919 Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 225; 267 FCR 628 Hernandez v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 415 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 264 CLR 123 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Le [2016] FCAFC 120; 244 FCR 56 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; 272 FCR 589, 602-604 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3; 264 CLR 421 MNLR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 35; 283 FCR 525 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 38; 220 FCR 1 Pattison v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177; 282 FCR 580 Plaintiff M 47/2012 v Director-General of Security [2012] HCA 46; 251 CLR 1 Plaintiff M76/2013 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] HCA 53; 251 CLR 322 Sowa v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 111 Taulahi v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 177; 246 FCR 146 Taulahi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 246 FCR 146 Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCA 1726; 57 FCR 451 Turay v Assistant Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1487
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate