Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AXV17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 121 Appeal from: AXV17 v Minister for Immigration and Anor [2019] FCCA 3150
File number: NSD 1938 of 2019
Judgment of: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 22 February 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where Independent Assessment Authority ("Authority") refused appellant's application for Safe Haven Enterprise visa – whether Authority's rejection of appellant's claim to be secretary of local rural development society was legally unreasonable – whether Authority's decision under s 473DD of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was affected by legal error – whether error material to outcome of review – whether Authority failed to consider claim that appellant feared harm by Buddhist monks – whether Authority's decision otherwise affected by jurisdictional error – whether primary judge's decision dismissing application for judicial review was correct
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H(1), 36(2), 473CA, 473CB, 473DC, 473DD
Cases cited: ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2020) 269 CLR 439 AUS17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2020) 269 CLR 494 BWC16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1375 Htun v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 194 ALR 244 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421 MZAPC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2021) 390 ALR 590 NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 217
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate