Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Sanda v PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty Ltd (Settlement Approval) [2023] FCA 143 File number(s): NSD 1245 of 2016
Judgment of: LEE J
Date of judgment: 23 February 2023
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – application under s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to approve settlement of representative proceeding –litigious dissociative identity disorder – bifurcation of the question of approval of the settlement and the distribution of the settlement sum – whether proposed deductions from settlement sum are just – whether settlement is fair and reasonable inter partes and inter se – settlement approved
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt IVA, Pt VB, ss 33K, 37P(2), 33T, 33V(1), 33V(2), 33ZF
Cases cited: Bellamy's Australia Ltd v Basil [2019] FCAFC 147; (2019) 372 ALR 638 Botsman v Bolitho (No 1) [2018] VSCA 278; (2018) 57 VR 68 Camilleri v The Trust Company (Nominees) Limited [2015] FCA 1468 Davis v Quintis Ltd (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) [2022] FCA 806 Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Limited v S&P Global Inc (Formerly McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc) (A Company Incorporated in New York) [2018] FCA 379 Liverpool City Council v McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc (now known as S&P Global Inc) [2018] FCA 1289 Money Max International Pty Ltd v QBE Insurance Group Ltd [2016] FCAFC 148; (2016) 245 FCR 191 Sanda v PTTEP Australasia (Ashmore Cartier) Pty Ltd (No 7) [2021] FCA 237
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate