Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v M101 Nominees Pty Ltd (No 5) [2023] FCA 163 File number(s): VID 524 of 2020
Judgment of: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 23 February 2023
Date of publication of reasons: 6 March 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where single judge made order restricting second defendant from leaving or attempting to leave Australia (travel ban order) – where travel ban order subsequently vacated – where Full Court made order reviving travel ban order – where plaintiff and second defendant sought orders by consent to vacate travel ban order
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 1323(1)(k) and 1323(3)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v M101 Nominees Pty Ltd, in the matter of M101 Nominees Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1166 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v M101 Nominees Pty Ltd (No 4) [2022] FCA 487 Mawhinney v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2022) 405 ALR 292; [2022] FCAFC 159
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 19
Date of hearing: 23 February 2023
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr CJ Tran
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: MinterEllison
Counsel for the Second Defendant: Mr P Bick KC and Mr A Aleksov
Solicitor for the Second Defendant: Roberts Gray Lawyers
ORDERS VID 524 of 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate