Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Royal Express Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) v Huang, in the matter of Royal Express Pty Ltd (No 6) [2023] FCA 164 File number(s): VID 287 of 2021
Judgment of: MCEVOY J
Date of judgment: 23 February 2023
Date of publication of reasons: 3 March 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – freezing orders over assets and ancillary orders – where freezing orders had previously been made against certain defendants – where there is evidence that the defendant to the proposed additional freezing order is the registered proprietor of additional property and shareholdings not disclosed in examinations conducted by the receivers – where investigations conducted by the receivers' solicitors have revealed caveats lodged over the defendant's properties – where there is a risk of dissipation of assets – interim freezing and ancillary disclosure orders made
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 181, 182, 596A, 596B and 597 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 7.32, 7.33
Cases cited: Royal Express Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) v Huang, in the matter of Royal Express Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 585 Royal Express Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) v Huang, in the matter of Royal Express Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 593 Royal Express Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) v Huang, in the matter of Royal Express Pty Ltd (No 4) [2021] FCA 691
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate