Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Nguyen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 180 Review of: Application for judicial review: Nguyen and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2021] AATA 4308
File number(s): VID 759 of 2021
Judgment of: O'SULLIVAN J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal's (Tribunal) decision pursuant to s 476A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Act) – where the delegate refused the applicant's application for a Partner (Residence) (Class BS) Visa on the grounds the applicant did not pass the character test pursuant to s 501(6)(d)(i) of the Act – whether the Tribunal considered the exercise of its discretion in s 501(1) of the Act – whether the Tribunal asked itself the wrong question and applied the wrong test and thereby failed to exercise its jurisdiction – whether the error of law was material – application allowed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend the originating application to add a third ground of review – whether the Tribunal failed to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration to the likelihood of the applicant engaging in further criminal or other serious conduct – leave refused
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 476A, 499(1), (2A), 501(1), (3A), (6)(d)(i), (7)(c), 501CA(4),(b)(ii) Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr)
Cases cited: Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109; (2020) 278 FCR 627 Au v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1240 Au v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 125 BET20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1539 Bettencourt v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services & Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 172; (2021) 287 FCR 294 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2000] HCA 47; (2000) 203 CLR 194 CRI026 v Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 19; (2018) 92 ALJR 529 Gaspar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1166; (2016) 153 ALD 338 Gaspar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1166; (2016) 153 ALD 338 Hossain v Minister for Immigration [2018] HCA 34; (2018) 264 CLR 123 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Marzano v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 66; (2017) 250 FCR 548 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo [2018] FCAFC 151; (2018) 267 FCR 320 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Sabharwal [2018] FCAFC 160 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA & Anor [2019] HCA 3; (2019) 264 CLR 421 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo [1997] HCA 22; (1997) 191 CLR 559 Minister for Immigration v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; (2018) 264 CLR 541; (2018) 92 ALJR 713 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v EBD20 [2021] FCAFC 179; (2021) 287 FCR 581 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BFW 20 by his Litigation Representative BFW20A [2020] FCAFC 121; (2020) 279 FCR 475 Norbis & Norbis [1986] HCA 17; (1986) 161 CLR 513 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 96 ALJR 497 Tohi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migration Services & Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 125; 285 FCR 187 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116, (2018) 263 FCR 531 WAFK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1293; (2003) 133 FCR 209
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate