Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Boost Tel Pty Ltd v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 213 File number(s): NSD 164 of 2023
Judgment of: THAWLEY J
Date of judgment: 14 March 2023
Date of publication of reasons: 17 March 2023
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – application for urgent interlocutory injunction – alleged infringement of trade mark – whether prima facie case of trade mark infringement – whether balance of convenience favours grant of interlocutory injunction – held: interlocutory injunction granted
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 10, 17, 20, 120(1), 120(2), 122(1)(b)(i)
Cases cited: Aldi Stores Ltd Partnership v Frito-Lay Trading Co GmbH [2001] FCA 1874; 190 ALR 185 Angoves Pty Ltd v Johnson [1982] FCA 119; 43 ALR 349 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46; 227 CLR 57 Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v FS Walton & Co Ltd [1937] HCA 51; 58 CLR 641 Baume & Co Ltd v A H Moore Ltd [1958] Ch 907 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd [1968] HCA 1; 118 CLR 618 Bohemia Crystal Pty Ltd v Host Corporation Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 235; 354 ALR 353 Bullock v Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 1) [1985] FCA 258; 5 FCR 464 Caterpillar Loader Hire (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Caterpillar Tractor Co [1983] FCA 143; 48 ALR 511 Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd [1999] FCA 1721; 96 FCR 107 E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Aust) Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 15; 241 CLR 144 Enagic Co Ltd v Horizons (Asia) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 1512; 396 ALR 633 F H Faulding & Co Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries of Australia and New Zealand Ltd [1965] HCA 72; 112 CLR 537 Generic Health v Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co [2013] FCAFC 17; 296 ALR 50 GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd [2013] FCAFC 102; 305 ALR 363 Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd v Conga Foods Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1808; 158 IPR 9 Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 1369; 163 IPR 1 Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd [1991] FCA 402; 30 FCR 326 Mark Foy's Ltd v Davies Coop & Co Ltd [1956] HCA 41; 95 CLR 190 Martin & Pleasance Pty Ltd v A Nelson & Co Ltd [2021] FCAFC 80 Medrad Inc v Alpine Medical Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 949; 82 IPR 101 Nature's Blend Pty Ltd v Nestle Australia Ltd [2010] FCAFC 117; 272 ALR 487 Pepsico Australia Pty Ltd v Kettle Chip Co Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 48; 135 ALR 192 Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Ltd [2019] FCA 1662; 375 ALR 251 Polo Textile Industries Pty Ltd v Domestic Textile Corporation Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 265; 42 FCR 227 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd [1999] FCA 1020; 93 FCR 365 Samsung Electronics Co v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238 Shell Co (Aust) Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd [1963] HCA 66; 109 CLR 407 Sigma Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wyeth and Another [2009] FCA 595; 61 IPR 339 Southern Cross Refrigerating Co v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd [1954] HCA 82; 91 CLR 592 Sports Warehouse Inc v Fry Consulting Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 664; 186 FCR 519 Swancom Pty Ltd v The Jazz Corner Hotel Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 157; 168 IPR 42 Vivo International Corp Pty Ltd v Tivo Inc [2012] FCAFC 159; 294 ALR 661 Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 59; 106 IPR 218 Wellness Pty Ltd v Pro Bio Living Waters Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 438; 61 IPR 242
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate