Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants [2023] FCA 217 Appeal from: Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants [2022] FCA 662 Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants (No 2) [2022] FCA 899
File number(s): NSD 607 of 2022 NSD 626 of 2022
Judgment of: HALLEY J
Date of judgment: 15 March 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal orders striking out statement of claim as an abuse of process and leave to appeal subsequent indemnity costs orders – where proposed appeal raises significant issue of whether it is an abuse of process to advance employment related claims in this Court against a respondent if the Fair Work Commission determines applicant is not an employee of the respondent – application for extension of time and leave to appeal orders striking out statement of claim granted but only on ground that primary judge erred in striking out statement of claim for abuse of process – leave to appeal costs orders granted but only to the extent that appeal against strike out orders succeeds
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 394, 570, 604 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 35.13
Cases cited: ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski (2012) 291 ALR 46; [2012] FCA 235 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd (2008) 169 FCR 227; [2008] FCAFC 123 BQQ15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 218 Decor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397; [1991] FCA 844 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Miraki [2022] FCAFC 96 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kalanje v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1618 Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd (t/as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants) [2021] FWCFB 6055 Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants [2022] FCA 662 Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants (No 2) [2022] FCA 662 Re Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd (t/as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants) [2021] FWC 4167 Tuakeu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 362
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate