Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Bruce Highway Caloundra to Sunshine Upgrade Case) (No 3) [2023] FCA 219 File number(s): QUD 238 of 2018
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 16 March 2023
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – imposition of pecuniary penalties – s 546 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – contraventions of ss 494(1), 497 and 500 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – principles of general and specific deterrence – where respondents' held mistaken belief regarding the right to enter the Project Side without producing entry permit – principles of course of conduct and totality – principles relating to personal payment orders – whether suspended penalties ought to be imposed – where individual respondents seek an extension of 90 days to make personal payment of pecuniary penalties
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld)
Cases cited: Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (2018) 262 CLR 157; [2018] HCA 3 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Bruce Highway Caloundra to Sunshine Upgrade Case) (No 2) [2019] FCA 1737 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Toowoomba Bypass Case) [2021] FCA 1128 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Adelaide Airport Case) [2021] FCA 951 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Quest Apartments Case) (No 2) (2018) 358 ALR 725; [2018] FCA 163 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v CoreStaff WA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1149 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Gava [2018] FCA 1480 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Ingham (No 2) (The Enoggera Barracks Case) [2018] FCA 263 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Parker [2021] FCA 704 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson (2022) 399 ALR 599; [2022] HCA 13 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 629 BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2001] FCA 336 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2007] FCA 1607 Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Botany Cranes Case) (No 4) [2021] FCA 525 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Non-Indemnification Personal Payment Case) [2018] FCAFC 97; (2018) 264 FCR 155 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Non-Indemnification Personal Payment Case) (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 117 Stuart v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2010) 185 FCR 308, [2010] FCAFC 65
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate