Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Stanbroke Pty Ltd v Queensland [2023] FCA 227 File number(s): QUD 22 of 2021
Judgment of: HALLEY J
Date of judgment: 16 March 2023
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – non-claimant application for determination of native title under s 61(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (NTA) – where respondent filed notice under s 86G of the NTA – whether within power and appropriate for Court to make orders sought – application granted
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 61, 66, 81, 86G, 94A, 225, 253 Native Title (Notices) Determination 2011 (No 1) (Cth) s 6
Cases cited: Aplin v Queensland (No 3) [2010] FCA 1515 Doyle v Queensland (No 3) [2011] FCA 1466 Mace v Queensland (2019) 274 FCR 41; [2019] FCAFC 233 Wagonga Local Aboriginal Land Council v Attorney General (NSW) [2020] FCA 1113 Worimi v Worimi Local Aboriginal Land Council (2010) 181 FCR 320; [2010] FCAFC 3 Worimi Local Aboriginal Land Council v Minister for Lands for the State of New South Wales (No 2) (2008) 181 FCR 300; [2008] FCA 1929
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Native Title
Number of paragraphs: 89
Date of last submission/s: 30 January 2023
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Solicitor for the Applicant: Thynne + Macartney Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondent: Crown Law
ORDERS QUD 22 of 2021
BETWEEN: STANDBROKE PTY LTD ACN 008 442 939 Applicant AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate