Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
DDZ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 233 Appeal from: DDZ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FedCFamC2G 157
File number(s): NSD 234 of 2022
Judgment of: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 20 March 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority to affirm the decision of a delegate of the Minister to refuse to grant the appellant a protection visa – whether primary judge made a jurisdictional error – whether Authority acted unreasonably – whether appellant required to provide submissions to satisfy materiality test – whether Authority failed to determine an integer of the claim or take into account relevant information
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 473BA, 473CA, 473CB, 473CB(1)(a), 473CB(1)(d), 473CB(1)(d)(iv), 473DA, 473DA(1), 473DB, 473DC, 473DC(2), 473DC(3), 473DD, 473EA(1), 473GA, 473GB, 476, Part 7AA
Cases cited: ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 34; (2020) 269 CLR 439 AGA16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 628 BYA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 269 FCR 94; [2019] FCAFC 44 CRW16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 710 DDZ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FedCFamC2G 157 Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 3; (2022) 289 FCR 21 DPI17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 43; (2019) 269 FCR 134 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; (2003) 197 ALR 389 ESQ18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 44; (2021) 283 FCR 164 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affiars [2001] FCA 824 Minister for Home Affairs v HSKJ [2018] FCAFC 217; (2018) 266 FCR 591 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 [2017] FCAFC 210; (2017) 253 FCR 475 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DZU16 [2018] FCAFC 32; (2018) 253 FCR 526 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; (2014) 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIZO [2009] HCA 37; (2009) 238 CLR 627 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; (2013) 212 FCR 99 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration v MZYTS [2013] FCAFC 114; (2013) 230 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16; (2014) 309 ALR 67 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; (2022) 403 ALR 398 Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; (2018) 264 CLR 217 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63; (2006) 228 CLR 152 Tickner v Chapman [1995] FCAFC 1726; (1995) 57 FLR 451
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate