Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
AXU17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 265 Appeal from: AXU17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 708
File number: NSD 508 of 2020
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the (then) Federal Circuit Court dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority – where the Authority found the appellant gave inconsistent accounts – no jurisdictional error established – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H(1), 36(2), 474
Cases cited: Plaintiff M64/2015 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] HCA 50; 258 CLR 173 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth [2003] HCA 2; 211 CLR 476
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 26
Date of hearing: 23 March 2023
Counsel for the Appellant: G Foster
Solicitor for the Appellant: Sentil Solicitor
Counsel for the First Respondent: N Swan
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mills Oakley
ORDERS NSD 508 of 2020
BETWEEN: AXU17 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS First Respondent
IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY Second Respondent
order made by: STEWART J DATE OF ORDER: 24 MARCH 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The name of the first respondent be amended to Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs. 2. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate