Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BXF17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 289 Appeal from: BXF17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FedCFamC2G 573
File number(s): VID 461 of 2022
Judgment of: O'BRYAN J
Date of judgment: 3 April 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority – whether primary judge erred in finding that the Authority did not misconstrue or misapply relevant statutory tests in ss 5H, 5J and 36 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether primary judge erred in finding that the Authority decision was not illogical, irrational or unreasonable – reasonableness of relocation – no error shown – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 5H, 5J, 36, 46A, Pt 7AA Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Act 2014 (Cth)
Cases cited: AHK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 161 ALD 457 CGA15 v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 268 FCR 362 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 CRI028 v The Republic of Nauru [2018] HCA 24 CSO15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 260 FCR 134 FCS17 v Minister for Home Affairs (2020) 276 FCR 644 In Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQRB (2013) 210 FCR 505 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541 SZATV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 233 CLR 18
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate