Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Honourable Jaclyn Symes [2023] FCA 302 File number: VID 657 of 2022
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 4 April 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for determination of a separate question – whether applicant has standing pursuant to s 539 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (hereafter, the "FW Act") – whether applicant or persons it represents are affected by statutory contraventions alleged against the respondents – whether determination of standing as a separate question would be just and convenient – whether circumstances warrant departure from usual course – interlocutory application dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) pt 3-1, pt 2-4, ss 53, 341, 343, 539, 540 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 30.01
Cases cited: Allan v Transurban City Link Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 167 Australian Federation of Air Pilots v Regional Express Holdings Ltd (2021) 290 FCR 239 AWB Ltd v Cole (No 2) (2006) 253 FCR 288 City of Swan v Lehman Brothers Australia Ltd (subject to a deed of company arrangement) (2009) 73 ACSR 86 Re McHattan and Collector of Customs (NSW) (1977) 1 ALD 67 Reading Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Mutual Provident Society (1999) 240 FCR 276 Spirits International BV v Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport (2011) 91 IPR 438 Sydney Local Health District v Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 3274 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate