Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Herd v Haines [2023] FCA 325 File number(s): QUD 789 of 2019
Judgment of: SARAH C DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 5 April 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – foreign judgments – registration of part New Zealand judgment under Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) – where party now seeks to register omitted judgment debt – power of the court to permit registration of further amount – whether party estopped from seeking to register
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 15AA, 33 Federal Court of Australia Act 1974 (Cth) s 37M Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) ss 67, 68, 72 Trans-Tasman Proceedings Regulation 2012 (Cth)
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 Chamberlain v Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 164 CLR 502 Clayton v Bant [2020] HCA 44; 272 CLR 1 New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act [2016] HCA 50; 260 CLR 232 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Tjungarrayi v Western Australia [2019] HCA 12; 269 CLR 150
Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Admiralty and Maritime
Number of paragraphs: 21
Date of hearing: 5 April 2023
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr E White
Solicitor for the Applicants: Tim Weissel Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr P Travers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate