Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BUZ20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 349 Appeal from: BUZ20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 3398
File number(s): VID 188 of 2021
Judgment of: WHEELAHAN J
Date of judgment: 18 April 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissing the appellant's application for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority affirming a decision not to grant the appellant a protection visa – whether by relying on a record of the appellant's entry interview the Authority's path of reasoning concerning the credibility of the appellant's claims was illogical or irrational – no error in primary judge's conclusion – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 65, pt 7AA, s 46A(2), s 473CA, s 473CC(1), s 476 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.03(a)
Cases cited: ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] HCA 34; 269 CLR 439 ASB17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 38; 268 FCR 271 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin [1990] HCA 21; 170 CLR 1 AVQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 133; 361 ALR 227 AWU16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 513 BRZ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 677 BUZ20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 3398 CQG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 146; 253 FCR 496 DWA17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 160; 272 FCR 152 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; 162 CLR 24 Minister for Home Affairs v AYJ17 [2019] FCA 591; 165 ALD 64 Minister for Home Affairs v DUA16 [2020] HCA 46; 95 ALJR 54 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZUXN [2016] FCA 516; 69 AAR 210 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 264 CLR 541 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48; 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT [2013] FCA 317; 212 FCR 99 MZZJO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 80; 239 FCR 436 Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; 403 ALR 398 Plaintiff M174 2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16; 264 CLR 217 Plaintiff S183/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 15; 399 ALR 644 Teubner v Humble [1963] HCA 11; 108 CLR 491
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate