Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Taheri v Queensland Police Service [2023] FCA 352 File number(s): VID 8 of 2020
Judgment of: Sarah C DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 18 April 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by respondent to transfer proceedings to Queensland Registry and/or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia – whether public interest considerations and expenditure of public funds justify prejudice to applicant – where applicant is represented by pro bono counsel – where no evidence provided by respondent as to the benefit of transferring proceedings
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 32AB, 37M, 48(1) Racial Discrimination Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.02, 20.13, 27.01
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Virgin Mobile Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1239 Moss v Contracoin Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 125 Mulhern v Pearce [2013] FCA 1138 National Mutual Holdings Pty Ltd v Sentry Corporation [1988] FCA 359; 19 FCR 155
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 28
Date of hearing: 18 April 2023
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms K O'Gorman
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms N A-Khavari
Solicitor for the Respondent: Crown Law
ORDERS VID 8 of 2020
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate