Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
INPEX Operations Australia Pty Ltd v AkzoNobel NV [2023] FCA 382 File number: WAD 162 of 2021
Judgment of: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 26 April 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - discovery - where categories of documents largely agreed by Redfern schedule in complex litigation - seven categories disputed - respective applications allowed in part
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.11, 20.20
Cases cited: Hanwha Solutions Corporation v LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd [2020] FCA 580 ML Ubase Holdings Co Ltd v Trigem Computer Inc [2007] NSWSC 859; (2007) 69 NSWLR 577 New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd (In Liq) v Renaissance Reinsurance Ltd [2007] NSWSC 258
Division: General Division
Registry: Western Australia
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 70
Date of last submissions: 23 September 2022 (joint schedule)
Date of hearing: 2 September 2022
Counsel for the Applicants: Dr RCA Higgins SC with Ms H Lenigas
Solicitor for the Applicants: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr PA Walker
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate