Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Parkin v Alliance Airlines Pty Limited [2023] FCA 386 File number(s): SAD 73 of 2022
Judgment of: O'SULLIVAN J
Date of judgment: 2 May 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE –application for leave to file an amended statement of claim and amended originating application – where pleading does not disclose a reasonable cause of action – leave refused – applicant to be given further opportunity to file amended statement of claim
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 342, 351 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 16.21(1) Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth), s 170DE Public Service Act 1922 (Cth), s 56(a) Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld), ss 7, 9 Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld), ss 8, 9(1)(h), 17(c), 20, 25, 58, 59 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld), ss 19, 47
Cases cited: Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41; (2000) 201 CLR 552 Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia & NZ Banking Group Ltd [1994] FCA 636, (1994) 217 ALR 226 Austal Ships Pty Ltd (unreported, AIRCFB, 13 August 1997) Banque Commerciale SA (En Liquidation) v Akhil Holdings Ltd [1990] HCA 11; (1990) 169 CLR 279 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners [1949] HCA 1; (1949) 78 CLR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 McManus v Scott-Charlton [1996] FCA 904; (1996) 70 FCR 16 Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority and Ors [2012] FCAFC 97; (2012) 203 FCR 325 Radisich v McDonald [2010] FCA 762; (2010) 198 IR 244
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate