Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Austin Engineering Pty Ltd v Podulova [2023] FCA 419 File number: WAD 83 of 2023
Judgment of: JACKSON J
Date of judgment: 1 May 2023
Date of publication of reasons: 4 May 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - intellectual property - alleged misuse of confidential and copyright information - orders sought for respondents to file and serve affidavits attesting to details of devices and networks which may contain applicant's confidential information - consideration of principles governing Norwich Pharmacal orders - orders sought made
Cases cited: Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd [1976] Ch 55 Authors Workshop v Bileru Pty Ltd (1989) 88 ALR 211 Computershare Ltd v Perpetual Registrars Ltd [2000] VSC 139; (2000) 1 VR 626 Hinchcliff v Jehad Abu-Dabat (1998) 41 IPR 400 Nexgen Sydney Pty Ltd v Barakat [2020] NSWSC 1169 Norwich Pharmacal Co v Commissioners of Customs & Excise [1974] AC 133 Orb ARL v Fiddler [2016] EWHC 361 (Comm) Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd (in liq) [2012] UKSC 55; [2012] 1 WLR 3333 Sega Enterprises Ltd v Alca Electronics [1982] FSR 516 Sky Channel Pty Ltd v Palmer [2003] FCA 1246
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate