Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mann on behalf of the Bigambul People #2 v State of Queensland [2023] FCA 450 File number(s): QUD 281 of 2022
Judgment of: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 11 May 2023
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – interlocutory application to strike out competing native title determination application – section 84C Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – application for summary dismissal pursuant to rule 26.01(d) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether native title determination application properly authorised – principles under sections 61 and 251B Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – where there was delay in bringing the overlapping native title determination application – abuse of process – where interlocutory application opposed by applicant – application granted
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 61, 61(1), 61(3), 61(4), 61(5), 61A, 62, 62(1), 62(1A), 84C, 84D, 84D(4)(a), 85A, 85A(2), 190A, 190F(6), 251B, 251B(b) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01, 26.01(1)(a), 26.01(1)(d)
Cases cited: Ashwin (on behalf of the Wutha People) v Western Australia and Others (No 4) (2019) 369 ALR 1 Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 1198 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256 Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77; [2004] FCAFC 226 Brown v State of South Australia [2009] FCA 206 Champion on behalf of the Marlinyu Ghoorlie Claim Group v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2022] FCA 65 Cox v Journeaux (1935) 52 CLR 713 Dieri People v State of South Australia [2003] FCA 187 Doctor on behalf of the Bigambul People v State of Queensland [2010] FCA 1406 Doctor on behalf of the Bigambul People v State of Queensland [2016] FCA 1447 Doctor on behalf of the Bigambul People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 716 Gomeroi People v Attorney General of NSW [2017] FCA 1464 Hazelbane v Northern Territory of Australia [2008] FCA 291 Kite v State of South Australia [2007] FCA 1662 Lawson on behalf of the "Pooncarie" Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v Minister for Land and Water Conservation (NSW) [2002] FCA 1517 Lawson on behalf of the Badimaya Barna Guda People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 104 McKenzie v South Australia (2005) 214 ALR 214; [2005] FCA 22 Melville on behalf of the Pitta Pitta People v State of Queensland [2022] FCA 387 Miller v State of South Australia (Far West Coast Sea Claim) (No 2) [2018] FCA 599 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Risk v National Native Title Tribunal [2000] FCA 1589 Spencer v the Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118 TJ (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 553 Vea Vea on behalf of the Wadja People v State of Queensland [2020] FCA 405 Walker v South Australia [2014] FCA 962 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate