Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
BFM21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 467 File number: QUD 146 of 2021
Judgment of: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 12 May 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – mandatory visa cancellation – application for review of personal decision of Minister not to revoke mandatory visa cancellation – whether failure to consider mandatory relevant consideration – whether decision involved illogical or irrational reasoning or legal unreasonableness – application dismissed
Legislation: Acts Interpetation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 501CA, 501(3A), 501G(1) Child Protection (Offender Reporting and Offender Prohibition Order) Act 2004 (Qld) Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) Sch 1 ss 23, 24, 27, 28
Cases cited: AVQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 133; (2018) 266 FCR 83 AXT19 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 32 AZAFQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 105; (2016) 243 FCR 451 Appellant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs 2003] FCAFC 184; (2003) 236 FCR 593 Brown v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 141; (2015) 235 FCR 88 BSJ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 78; (2017) 252 FCR 82 BRZ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 677 BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34; (2019) 268 CLR 29 Carrascalao v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 107; (2017) 252 FCR 352 CKL21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCAFC 70; (2022) 293 FCR 634 Coker v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 929; (2017) 160 ALD 588 Guclukol v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 148; (2020) 279 FCR 611 Kamal v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 387 Minister for Home Affairs v Buadromo [2018] FCAFC 151; (2019) 267 FCR 320 Minister for Home Affairs v Ogawa [2019] FCAFC 98; (2019) 269 FCR 536 Minister for Home Affairs v Omar [2019] FCAFC 188; (2019) 272 FCR 589 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Maioha [2018] FCAFC 216; (2018) 267 FCR 643 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS [2014] FCAFC 16; (2014) 309 ALR 67 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR [2011] HCA 1; (2011) 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2000] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migration Services and Multicultural Affairs v CTB19 [2020] FCAFC 166; (2020) 280 FCR 178 Moana v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 54; (2015) 230 FCR 367 Muggeridge v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 200; (2017) 255 FCR 81 MZZGE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 72 Pallas v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 149 Plaintiff M1/2021 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 17; (2022) 96 ALJR 497 R v Falconer [1990] HCA 49; (1990) 171 CLR 30 R v Milloy [1993] 1 Qd R 298 SZDXZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 109 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146; (2012) 207 FCR 277 Viane v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 116; (2018) 263 FCR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate