Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
CEH20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 477 Appeal from: CEH20 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 2509
File number: VID 498 of 2022
Judgment of: RAPER J
Date of judgment: 16 May 2023
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from orders of the (former) Federal Circuit Court of Australia affirming a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming a decision of the delegate not to grant a protection visa – by the absence of a real chance of the appellant being persecuted in China in the foreseeable future for any of the reasons in s 5J(1)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) such that Australia did not have protection obligations under s 36(2)(a) nor did the appellant meet the alternative criteria for complementary protection under s 36(2)(aa) – whether the primary judge failed to give active, intellectual consideration to the appellant's written submissions – whether the primary judge erred in failing to find that the Tribunal had breached s 425 of the Act – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H, 5J, 5J(1), 5J(1)(a), 36, 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 422B, 423, 423A, 424AA, 424A, 424A(1), 424A(3), 424A(3)(a), 425, 425(1), 501 Migration Amendment (Review Provisions) Act 2007 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment (Electronic Transactions and Methods of Notification) Act 2001 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998 (Cth) Explanatory Memorandum, Migration Amendment (Review Provisions) Bill 2006 Explanatory Memorandum, Migration Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate